Cheque Bounce Law

  • Legal Solutions
  • Cheque Bounce Home
  • Contact
You are here: Home / India / Cheque Bounce/Dishonour – Compounding of Offence Guidelines by Supreme Court

Cheque Bounce/Dishonour – Compounding of Offence Guidelines by Supreme Court

May 13, 2013 By LegalSolutions.in 1 Comment

In the matter of Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 

… the Honorable Supreme Court has laid down following guidelines, according to the stage at which compounding is reached in a cheque bouncing case by the parties to the matter:

It is proposed as follows:

(a) That directions can be given that the Writ of Summons be suitably modified making it clear to the accused that he could make an application for compounding of the offences at the first or second hearing of the case and that if such an application is made, compounding may be allowed by the court without imposing any costs on the accused.

(b) If the accused does not make an application for compounding as aforesaid, then if an application for compounding is made before the Magistrate at a subsequent stage, compounding can be allowed subject to the condition that the accused will be required to pay 10% of the cheque amount to be deposited as a condition for compounding with the Legal Services Authority, or such authority as the Court deems fit.

(c) Similarly, if the application for compounding is made before the Sessions Court or a High Court in revision or appeal, such compounding may be allowed on the condition that the accused pays 15% of the cheque amount by way of costs.

(d) Finally, if the application for compounding is made before the Supreme Court, the figure would increase to 20% of the cheque amount.

Let it also be clarified that any costs imposed in accordance with these guidelines should be deposited with the Legal Services Authority operating at the level of the Court before which compounding takes place. For instance, in case of compounding during the pendency of proceedings before a Magistrate’s Court or a Court of Sessions, such costs should be deposited with the District Legal Services Authority. Likewise, costs imposed in connection with composition before the High Court should be deposited with the State Legal Services Authority and those imposed in connection with composition before the Supreme Court should be deposited with the National Legal Services Authority.

The graded scheme for imposing costs is a means to encourage compounding at an early stage of litigation. In the status quo, valuable time of the Court is spent on the trial of these cases and the parties are not liable to pay any Court fee since the proceedings are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, even though the impact of the offence is largely confined to the private parties.

Even though the imposition of costs by the competent court is a matter of discretion, the scale of costs has been suggested in the interest of uniformity. The competent Court can of course reduce the costs with regard to the specific facts and circumstances of a case, while recording reasons in writing for such variance. Bona fide litigants should of course contest the proceedings to their logical end. Even in the past, this Court has used its power to do complete justice under Article 142 of the Constitution to frame guidelines in relation to subject-matter where there was a legislative vacuum.

Filed Under: India, Law, Precedents

Trackbacks

  1. Judgment: Supreme Court lays down guidelines for speedy disposal of Cheque Bounce cases - Cheque Bounce Law says:
    April 29, 2015 at 1:31 pm

    […] While earlier, in 2010, the Hon. SC had laid down guidelines for early settlement in cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. It had ruled that defaulters going for early settlement before the trial court would have to pay just the principal amount with applicable interest. The said Judgment can be read here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court: Place to file complaint in case of Cheque Bounce matter
  • SC: Liability in case of Joint Account Holders
  • Judgment: Supreme Court lays down guidelines for speedy disposal of Cheque Bounce cases
  • Judgment: Indian Bank Association Versus Union of India PIL SC WP(C) NO.18 OF 2013 (21 April 2014)
  • Cheque Bounce Case can be settled at any stage: Delhi High Court

Categories

  • Bare Act
  • Basics
  • Cyprus
  • India
  • Law
  • News
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Precedents
  • Press Release
  • Qatar
  • RBI
  • UAE
  • UK

Copyright © 2022 · LegalSolutions.in · Log in